abdication

To modi ka bhi to 1 पैर जेल में लटका हुआ हे

Why BJP and RSS is silent on the Government handling the national and international issues.

मोदी - नेतन्याहू और ट्रम्प तीनों की इस्थिति एक जैसी है। जब तक सत्ता में हैं तब तक सुरक्षित हैं। एक बार सत्ता चली गयी तो इसके बाद तीनों को फांसी या उम्रकैद होगी।

I couldn’t agree more. H &M should have had their titles,and presence on the website, removed when they left the RF. There is no excuse for them still on the website as they are private citizens now.

GET HARRY AND MAGAN OFF THE FRICKEN ROYAL WEB SITE. !!!!!! NOW

Yes you are quite right, again, Fiona. There is something so fishy going on and yes, Meghan has everything to do with it. GET THEM OFF THE WEBSITE NOW!!

The government is destroying our country and the King will not or cannot do anything. What is the point of the Monarchy?

End the monarchy isn't it's entirety, they no longer serve a useful purpose and they are all nothing more than entitled parasites

ABOLISH THE MONARCHY THEY'VE OUTLIVED THEIR USEFULNESS

Andrew needs to go to the USA to face the music.

The "Firm" covered for the paedophile formally known as Prince. The Nonce of York had to get his money from some place. A Navy pension would never cover a £12 million bribe. His Mother paid off his accusers, when he should have had to face his day in court. Sweeping the filthy perversions of an ultra privileged , spoiled, self serving parasite under the carpet is not the basis for a fully fair and transparent democratic state in the mid 21st century.

In August 2021, a process server was told by security at the Royal Lodge that legal papers for Prince Andrew regarding Virginia Giuffre’s sexual assault lawsuit would not be accepted and would not be forwarded to the Duke of York. Do you honestly think the Queen and Charles didn't know Andrew was being served papers from Virginia Guiffre؟ in the end the papers were served to Andrew's US-based lawyers.

An abdication means another coronation. Who’s paying for that?

When the king’s “health” causes him to “retire” at the nearest reasonable future opportunity, we might need to pretend that’s the real cause. The outcome will be the same.

He is planning to abdicate anyway due to illness...

Five years from now, (think how rapidly that goes), young Prince George will be 18 and eligible to accede to the throne, to be his father's wingman, to do whatever's needed. The California duo can feel the clock ticking.

Diana? I never took to her. I am about 5 years older than she is and the way she did her side eye look always made me think she was sly. She just made my hackles rise although I never met her. My mother loved her and even got to shake her hand after waiting for hours by the roadside for one of her visits. She said she was more lovely in person than in the pics! IMO Diana was a woman of two parts. These parts split into William and Harry. Jeykll and Hyde

Well…think about it…the Queen knew about Andrew’s shenanigans for a LONG time. She mulled over how to conceal all the evil, yet extract him from the royal mess. She was associated with the meeting of the minds & the ultimate payoff…$$$$$

Some of the attacks on W&C are to drive engagement. The outlets make money if the content is watched or read and commented on.

There's a fundamental difference between reporting the news and creating the news. It seems to me that in the age of digital disruptors some are trying to create a crisis here where none exists.

Mark Dolan is an avid supporter of 'Nigel', so there is clearly something wrong with his brain and critical thinking faculties. He seems to specialise in scurrilous clickbait - it's him and people like him that are dragging public discourse into the gutter. Best ignored.

The king cannot abdicate as he has been crowned and taken an oath to remain monarch until death. The only reason Edward was able to abdicate was because he hadn’t been crowned

IF WE DON'T HAVE A ✝️CHRISTIAN KING 🤴IN OUR ✝️COUNTRY🇬🇧 THEN WHY DO WE NEEN A MONARCHY ‼️‼️‼️✝️🇬🇧‼️‼️

If Charles dissolves Parliament and Abdicates it's time for William . If he does not , end the Monarchy , because they are of no use to the people . We do not need a " surrenderer to all faiths ."

Let's just all step back and think for a moment... how can the concept of a 'royal family' with untold wealth and privilege, funded by and ruling over their 'subjects', all continued by birthright... still exist today?

The Royal Family may survive this. But. Change is overdue and inevitable. The Queen gave money to buy off a witness. Whose money was that, the Freedom of Information Act cannot access royalty. That must change. Deference is gone and accountability is required.

This is a fraught period and Reform is much on the agenda. We have to enter a period of honesty...and that AMW has let himself, his family, his Country and staff down. The Emily Maitliss interview will haunt him and the Institution of Monarchy to come. I confess - I am a Republican with strong Republican tendencies. However, I'm British...and the Monarchy is like a fix and fitting on National Life. However, the searing truth must be acknowledged. The War generation of 45 are fast fading out of view. The emerging generations, especially in the last 40 years no longer sit on awe or reverence to a family and institution that is more in keeping with a Soap Opera than as a family that underpins and exemplifies the values of a Nation. Just think - Its a Royal Knockout...No, the chilly winds of Reform are heading up The Mall, and though the King has been exemplary since his accession. The Prince of Wales has the unenviable job of initiating change and to do it with imagination and care in mind, so that the actual Institution can endure intact, or at least the Throne at best. Time for honesty.....

This is literally the only perspective I’ve seen that shows an ounce of logic , unlike the sensationalist YouTubers who behave like a pack of wolves.

Rational & reasonable as always.

I appreciate your perspective very much.